Apologetics: Did Jesus Exist? (SG Essays)

Free download. Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device. You can download and read online Apologetics: Did Jesus Exist? (SG Essays) file PDF Book only if you are registered here. And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with Apologetics: Did Jesus Exist? (SG Essays) book. Happy reading Apologetics: Did Jesus Exist? (SG Essays) Bookeveryone. Download file Free Book PDF Apologetics: Did Jesus Exist? (SG Essays) at Complete PDF Library. This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats. Here is The CompletePDF Book Library. It's free to register here to get Book file PDF Apologetics: Did Jesus Exist? (SG Essays) Pocket Guide.

But in his view of the world, why should he be angry? In an atheistic, evolutionary universe where people are just animals, murder is no different than a lion killing an antelope.


If people are just chemical accidents, then why punish one for killing another? The concepts that human beings are valuable, are not simply animals, are not simply chemicals, have genuine freedom to make choices, are responsible for their actions, and are bound by a universal objective moral code all stem from a Christian worldview. Such things simply do not make sense in an atheistic view of life.

Many atheists behave morally and expect others to behave morally as well. But absolute morality simply does not comport with atheism. Why should there be an absolute, objective standard of behavior that all people should obey if the universe and the people within it are simply accidents of nature? Of course, people can assert that there is a moral code. But who is to say what that moral code should be? Some people think it is okay to be racist; others think it is okay to kill babies, and others think we should kill people of other religions or ethnicities, etc. Who is to say which position should be followed?

  • Did Jesus Exist? Searching for Evidence Beyond the Bible - Biblical Archaeology Society;
  • Browse Articles.
  • The Social Worker Survival Guide (True Stories of Life in a Psychiatric Hospital Book 8).
  • Hoop Doctor (Jake Maddox Girl Sports Stories);

Any standard of our own creation would necessarily be subjective and arbitrary. Morality is subjective.

Not Conclusive

We each have the right to create our own moral code. And therefore, you cannot impose your personal morality on other people! When push comes to shove, no one really believes that morality is merely a subjective, personal choice. Another inconsistency occurs when atheists attempt to be rational. Rationality involves the use of laws of logic. Laws of logic prescribe the correct chain of reasoning between truth claims.

It is snowing.

The Jesus of History versus the Christ of Faith

Therefore, it is cold out. Laws of logic, like modus ponens , are immaterial, universal, invariant, abstract entities. They are universal and invariant because they apply in all places and at all times modus ponens works just as well in Africa as it does in the United States, and just as well on Friday as it does on Monday. And they are abstract because they deal with concepts. They are immaterial, universal, invariant, abstract entities, because God is an immaterial Spirit , omnipresent, unchanging God who has all knowledge Colossians The law of non-contradiction, for example, stems from the fact that God does not deny Himself 2 Timothy The Christian can account for laws of logic; they are the correct standard for reasoning because God is sovereign over all truth.

Evangelism Essay | Bartleby

However, the atheist cannot account for laws of logic. He cannot make sense of them within his own worldview. How could there be immaterial, universal, invariant, abstract laws in a chance universe formed by a big bang? Most atheists have a materialistic outlook—meaning they believe that everything that exists is material, or explained by material processes. But laws of logic are not material! You cannot pull a law of logic out of the refrigerator! If atheistic materialism is true, then there could be no laws of logic, since they are immaterial.

Thus, logical reasoning would be impossible! No one is denying that atheists are able to reason and use laws of logic. The point is that if atheism were true, the atheist would not be able to reason or use laws of logic because such things would not be meaningful. The fact that the atheist is able to reason demonstrates that he is wrong. By using that which makes no sense given his worldview, the atheist is being horribly inconsistent. How could there be laws at all without a lawgiver? The atheist cannot account for 1 the existence of laws of logic, 2 why they are immaterial, 3 why they are universal, 4 why they do not change with time, and 5 how human beings can possibly know about them or their properties.

But of course, all these things make perfect sense on the Christian system. Laws of logic owe their existence to the biblical God.

  • Sonnets from the Portuguese.
  • Human and Machine Problem Solving.
  • Primary Sidebar.
  • Second Fiddle.
  • Verbos franceses (Spanish Edition)!
  • Is Fulfilled Prophecy of Value for Scholarly Apologetics?.

Yet they are required to reason rationally, to prove things. So the biblical God must exist in order for reasoning to be possible. The existence of the biblical God is the prerequisite for knowledge and rationality.

It is a devastating and conclusive argument, one that only a few people have even attempted to refute and none of them successfully. Though the transcendental argument for God is deductively sound, not all atheists will be convinced upon hearing it. It may take time for them to even understand the argument in the first place. As I write this chapter, I am in the midst of an electronic exchange with an atheist who has not yet fully grasped the argument. Real-life discussions on this issue take time. But even if the atheist fully understands the argument, he may not be convinced.

We must remember that there is a difference between proof and persuasion. Proof is objective, but persuasion is subjective. The transcendental argument does indeed objectively prove that God exists. We might imagine a disobedient child who is about to be punished by his father. Atheists deny with their lips the biblical God, not for logical reasons, but for psychological reasons.

Latest News

It is the Holy Spirit that must give him the ability to repent 1 Corinthians ; 2 Timothy So we must keep in mind that it is not our job to convert people—nor can we. Our job is to give a defense of the faith in a way that is faithful to the Scriptures 1 Peter It is the Holy Spirit that brings conversion. But God can use our arguments as part of the process by which He draws people to Himself. Do you have answers to the big questions about the Christian faith, evolution, creation, and the biblical worldview?

Now you get the important information you need regarding the existence of God, global warming and climate change, cloning and stem cells, human and chimp DNA, the importance of Mount St. Helens, and more. Answers in Genesis is an apologetics ministry , dedicated to helping Christians defend their faith and proclaim the gospel of Jesus Christ.

View Cart. Jason Lisle on September 9, Share: Email Using: Gmail Yahoo! Outlook Other. Helens Important to the Origins Controversy? The New Answers Book 3. Read Online Buy Book. When he saw the crowds, he had compassion on them, because they were harassed and helpless, like sheep without a shepherd. Ask the Lord of the harvest, therefore. Gabriel, Louisiana Saturday, June 22, Since beginning this course, I have turned my daily neighborhood walks into opportunities to spread the message of Christ.

I have been more intentional about meeting my neighbors and learning about their life situations. Most are. I also see motivation of servant evangelism in Mathew Jesus is telling his deciples to feed the hungry, give the homeless shelter and cloths, take care of the sick, and meet the essential needs of people, when doing this; it would be the same as if the disciples were meeting the needs of Jesus.

Savant Evangelism is more about showing love thru the gospel rather than speaking the gospel. Advantages of Using This Method. It is a plan of salvation that utilizes various verses derived from the book of Romans. These verses are often memorized and used by evangelists to form a cohesive explanation of the need of salvation.